5 Reasons why I’ll be using Scrivener for NanoWrimo

Earlier this week, I read the bravely titled Why I Will Never Use Microsoft Word Again by the mighty Jeff Goins. People I know say that phrase all the time out loud, but few people in positions of influence in the writing world would commit it so defiantly to screen. Yet, as soon as I read the title I was nodding, partially because I already suspected what the solution would be.

The world at large has not yet moved on from Microsoft Word and I suspect it won’t for a while yet. Submissions, anything for the day job – Microsoft Word is the only accepted choice. Even with the huge increase in popularity of Apple products there has been very little give, with an emphasis instead on better conversion technology.

But when it comes to my writing, Scrivener is my tool of choice. For those of you doing NanoWrimo this year who have never tried it, there is a free trial on their website, available for both windows and mac.

But Scrivener is not just for fiction. I think that is a common misconception. Any piece of writing that requires more than a couple of sides of A4 plain text will benefit from it’s functionality. With that in mind, here’s why I’ll be using it for NanoWrimo.

Planning Tools

You can’t write a word of your novel itself before midnight, but there are no rules about pre-writing for Nano. In fact, I would positively encourage anyone trying it for the first time to do as much pre-writing as possible. Scrivener has the best outlining tool I’ve ever come across, and the cork board allows you to visually play with concepts, themes and characters in a way that is impossible on a  piece of simple word processing software.

feature-corkboard

Name Generator

This is almost an afterthought for some people, but it has saved my bacon at 6am more than once. It’s amazing for those times when an incidental character turns up. You know the sort, the ones where you need them for a plot point but they don’t come with a back story or enough of a personality in your brain to instinctively know they are called Bob. The name generator tool can do either first names or both, with cultural, gender and language options if you need to narrow it down to something more specific. Don’t let trying to work it out derail your writing flow any longer.

Templates

Again, another key pre-writing feature that it just awesome. Scrivener comes with pre-developed templates for characters and settings, so you can keep track of the key details (nothing like your protagonist changing eye colour halfway through the book is there?). You can attach images and web content in Scrivener too, so keeping it all in one place is easy. What’s more, you can customise it so you can create your own templates. I’m trying my hand at an epic fantasy for Nano this year, so I have a template for my magic systems to make sure they balance each other out and the complicated details don’t get lost. One click and I can easily reference back, rather than having to search through an entire document to find a tiny but suddenly important detail.

Formatting and Fonts

Let’s face it, Word has become more and more complex. Whilst powerful functionality is good, it gets lost in amongst the everyday, and for most people, they never use any of it anyway. When writing a long document (again, regardless of fact or fiction), the key is to get quality content in place, not to be able to provide fourteen different types of shadowing to your title. I like the fact that Scrivener places the basic, everyday options up front and centre, with much of the formatting and additional functionality happening in the background. Instead the screen is taken up with the elements you need to keep your eye on, such as the binder on the left so you can see where you are in the grand scheme of things, and the synopsis notes on the right so you can drill down into the specifics of your current chapter. I love that my screen isn’t mainly wasted space.

write_structure_revise

Project Targets

Again, a relatively small tool, but the one thing I love the most. The project target box sits happily in the corner of the screen, allowing me to see my daily word target, as well as the overall progress based on my estimates of the total length, and the countdown to deadline. The target can even dynamically change if the deadline is the key element, so if you have a day off, Scrivener reminds you that you have to put in the extra words over the life of the project. Simple, but oh so effective at 6am when you’re trying to do 1000 words before the rest of the world wakes up.

feature-statistics

Having started this whole thing by saying that everyone still uses Microsoft Word, it would be foolish of me to push something that then had no application in the real world. I’ve written 6 full length novels in Scrivener now and exported them all successfully to either Word, ePub or Kindle formats. Likewise, if you’ve already done some of your project in a different format, you can import into Scrivener if you want to give it a go.

So that’s why I always use – and will continue to use – Scrivener for all my writing projects, not just for NanoWrimo. Check it out and let me know what you think.

All images courtesy of literatureandlatte

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “5 Reasons why I’ll be using Scrivener for NanoWrimo

  1. melissadoesproduct

    Hello Sherri!

    I glanced at Scrivener the last time I shopped for an employer’s authorship tool, and I was a bit intimidated by the complexity of the features. I always felt that my writing didn’t warrant its own “studio.” That being said, I have definitely felt the frustrations of organizing content in Microsoft Word.

    I dig that the Scrivener free trial is for 30 days of *use*, not just 30 calendar days. Between that and your commentary on the value of specific features (I hate making up character names!), I think I need to try it out.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Like

    Reply
    1. sherrinicholds Post author

      Hi Melissa!
      I’m still not sure I use all of the features to the best of their ability, but I think that is the case with most software products. For my first couple of books, I really only used the most basic features and that was still miles better than Word. I feel more comfortable if I’ve got a semi-decent plan and that’s what it really is best at helping me organising. Plus, I found plenty of information available after a quick google (and on YouTube) to get things up and running as quickly as possible.

      Good luck with the writing, whatever you decide 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
      1. http://goanalyze.info/priceza.com

        I would like to point out my gratitude for your kind-heartedness supporting those who really need help with in this concern. Your personal dedication to getting the message all over ended up being pretty advantageous and have specifically made many people like me to arrive at their desired goals. Your informative suggestions implies this much a person like me and extremely more to my office colleagues. Thanks a lot; from everyone of us.

        Like

        Reply
      2. http://goanalyze.info/verisign.com

        Thanks a bunch for this interesting article, I really appreciate it, I was just thinking of that very identical topic. It’s always so convenient and fortuitous when one finds a post that I have been hoping to find without needing to search all over the net all night, LOL!

        Like

        Reply
  2. annekaelber

    Hi Sherri,

    I just finished the rough draft of a novel, written entirely in Scrivener. Coming from Linux and plain-text files as I did, it’s just like coming home and yet, much more powerful than my previous process.

    Despite how daunting Scrivener seems at first, I do less maintenance and more writing. This draft took me about 4 months, working roughly ‘part-time’ on the novel. Without Scrivener, I think this draft would have taken another 2-3 months.

    I’m in that “marinating” stage right now, so I’m branching out and reading all I can about what I can do with Scrivener.

    Anne.

    Like

    Reply
  3. seaofgold2012

    Scrivener is a wonderful organizing tool, and I am using it for it’s outlining power, corkboard functions etc. However, I am using Word to draft content. I personally find it much faster; I can keep up with my thoughts with Word, while Scrivener on my work station is two beats behind. It’s so easy to convert the word document to straight text and past it into the appropriate chapter in Scrivener.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s